Judge Orders White House to Restore Access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico

Reporters for CNN, MS NOW and Politico returned to the White House on Thursday after U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly ordered the Trump administration to immediately restore their hard-pass credentials and temporarily blocked enforcement of President Donald Trump’s ban.(Tell Us USA Ai image)

HOME I I HI TECH NEWS I SPORTS I CONTACT



	Judge Orders White House to Restore Access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico Diane Simpson - White House Correspondent Tell Us USA News Network WASHINGTON — Reporters for CNN, MS NOW and Politico returned to the White House on Thursday after U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly ordered the Trump administration to immediately restore their hard-pass credentials and temporarily blocked enforcement of President Donald Trump’s ban. Kelly’s 14-day temporary restraining order found that the three news organizations were likely to prevail on their claim that the administration revoked their access without constitutionally required due process. The judge also rejected the White House’s asserted national-security rationale, finding that the record did not support the contention that stripping the outlets’ credentials would protect national security. The dispute erupted after Trump announced Sept. 18 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico would be barred from White House grounds, accusing the outlets of false and negative coverage. The three organizations sued Monday, arguing that the administration had retaliated against constitutionally protected newsgathering and speech. But the administration’s compliance was neither immediate nor smooth. Despite Kelly’s overnight directive ordering officials to immediately return, reinstate and restore the credentials, reporters from the affected outlets were initially turned away at White House gates Thursday morning. The outlets sought emergency court intervention, saying the administration had continued to deny access in direct conflict with the judge’s order. The White House later told the court that press officials had been directed to restore access at 7:10 a.m., that the Secret Service reactivated badges at roughly 9:07 a.m., and that recovered badges were made available at the gate before 10 a.m. Reporters from CNN, MS NOW and Politico were allowed back onto the grounds around midday. The delay sharpened the confrontation. It transformed what had been framed by the White House as a dispute over access into a more serious question: whether the executive branch would promptly obey a federal court order protecting the ability of journalists to cover the presidency. The ruling does not end the case. It preserves the outlets’ access while the underlying constitutional challenge proceeds, with the temporary order set to remain in effect for 14 days unless modified by the court. CNN, MS NOW and Politico must file their motion for a preliminary injunction by Sept. 28; the administration’s response is due Oct. 2, followed by the plaintiffs’ reply on Oct. 5. Still, Kelly’s ruling marks an early and consequential setback for the White House. The court did not rule that the press has an unrestricted right to enter every part of the executive complex or participate in every presidential event. Instead, it concluded that once the government grants regular access through hard passes, it cannot selectively revoke that access as punishment without adequate procedures and a lawful justification. That distinction is central. The First Amendment does not compel favorable coverage. It does, however, limit the government’s ability to use official access as leverage against journalists whose reporting it dislikes. The confrontation echoes earlier White House press-access fights, but this case has broader implications because it involves three major outlets barred together after criticism of the president’s coverage. The collective nature of the action made it more difficult for the administration to characterize the matter as an isolated credential dispute involving a single reporter’s conduct. The White House had argued that access is a privilege, not a right. That formulation captures part of the legal reality: physical access to the White House can be regulated for security and operational reasons. But the court’s order makes clear that the government cannot wield that authority arbitrarily or discriminate against news organizations because their reporting is unwelcome. For now, the reporters are back inside. The larger battle will determine whether a White House can turn press credentials into a political loyalty test — and whether the courts will draw a firm line before that practice becomes normalized. How We Got Here: Anatomy of a Retaliation Trump Fires the First Shot Friday, Sept. 18 Trump announces on Truth Social that CNN, MS NOW, and Politico are banned "effective immediately" over cumulative "lies and fiction." The impulse decision catches high-level White House aides completely off guard. Secret Service Confiscates Badges Saturday, Sept. 19 Uniformed Secret Service officers carry out the order, seizing hard passes from reporters at the gates. Stripped of access, the banned networks are forced to broadcast from the cold corner of Pennsylvania Avenue and 17th Street. Outlets Sue; Press Corps Fights Back Monday, Sept. 21 The three outlets file a joint federal lawsuit alleging First and Fifth Amendment violations. In a rare display of solidarity, major TV networks pull the plug on joint pool video coverage of presidential events. DOJ Struggles in Court Wednesday, Sept. 23 At a tense 45-minute hearing, DOJ lawyer Michael Velchik scrambles to frame access as a "privilege" while floating national security concerns. Judge Kelly openly mocks the White House's sudden discovery of "due process" letters sent to the networks only after they filed suit. The Federal Order Drops Thursday, Sept. 24 Judge Kelly issues the 14-day restraining order, ordering hard passes restored. Compliance at the White House complex remains spotty by daybreak. The Real Battle Ahead Make no mistake: This fight is far from over. The administration tried a quick maneuver on Tuesday by sending letters to the banned outlets accusing them of "decorum violations" and setting a deadline of Friday afternoon for the newsroom executives to appeal. That looks like a transparent attempt to manufacture a fake paper trail so they can turn around next week and ban them all over again under the guise of "due process." Because temporary restraining orders generally can't be appealed, the administration is backed into a corner for the next 14 days while both sides prepare for the preliminary injunction battle. If the White House continues to bar journalists at the gate in defiance of a federal court order today, expect Boutrous and his legal team to march straight back into Judge Kelly's courtroom to demand contempt proceedings. The administration is testing how far it can bend the rules—and the press corps isn't backing down. This Tell Us USA News Network report is produced in part by Ai and can make mistakes. Please contact and let us know of any errors you may find. info@tellususa.com